Virtual care is no longer a temporary workaround. The U.S. telehealth market is projected to reach $65.35 billion in 2026, and 71.4% of physicians now use telehealth weekly according to the American Medical Association. But virtual visits come with their own billing complexity. Modifier mismatches and incorrect Place of Service codes alone account for nearly 30% of all telehealth rejections in 2026, and industry denial rates for virtual care claims have reached 11.8% industrywide. For practices billing telehealth at volume, choosing the right billing partner is now a revenue protection decision. This guide ranks the top 10 telehealth billing companies in the US for 2026, compares their strengths side by side, and explains what to confirm before you outsource telehealth billing to any vendor.
Telehealth claims carry a coding complexity that most general billers are not built to handle. Every claim requires accurate Place of Service selection: POS 02 when the patient connects from a non-home setting, and POS 10 when the patient is at home, which pays the higher non-facility rate. Modifier 95 applies to synchronous audio-video visits while Modifier 93 covers audio-only encounters. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services maintains more than 250 eligible telehealth codes on its approved list, and any code not on the current list is denied automatically. In January 2026, Medicare also introduced a new in-person visit requirement before the first mental health telehealth session, creating a new front-end denial trigger that generic billing teams frequently miss.
The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026 extended Medicare telehealth flexibilities through December 31, 2027, which locks in current coverage rules for the near term. But extended coverage does not mean simplified billing. Practices that outsource telehealth billing to a specialized partner get POS code accuracy, modifier validation, and payer-specific rule tracking built into every claim before submission rather than discovered after a denial.
Below is a side by side comparison of the leading telehealth billing companies in USA for 2026, ranked by service breadth, telehealth-specific capabilities, and practice fit.
| Rank | Company | Best For | Pricing Model | Standout Strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | EZ MD Solutions | All in one telehealth billing and RCM partner | Percent of collections or flat fee | Telehealth billing bundled with virtual assistants, scribing, credentialing, and coding under one HIPAA compliant roof |
| 2 | Athenahealth | Large multi location and ambulatory practices | Enterprise subscription | Processes over 400 million claim checks annually with 23,000 proprietary validation rules |
| 3 | CareCloud | Data driven mid size practices | Custom quote | AI claim scrubbing with built in telehealth billing and specialty specific workflows |
| 4 | eClinicalWorks | Ambulatory practices on the eClinicalWorks platform | Subscription plus RCM fee | Native telehealth module unified directly with billing and charge capture |
| 5 | NextGen Healthcare | Independent and multi specialty practices | Custom quote | Connects virtual visits to end to end RCM with integrated patient payment portal |
| 6 | DrChrono | Mobile first and independent telehealth providers | Percent of collections | iPad and mobile native EHR with built in telehealth billing and correct POS code routing |
| 7 | Tebra | Solo and small independent practices | Percent of collections | Claims scrubbing and automated payments through a network of 1,600 plus specialty matched billers |
| 8 | SybridMD | Behavioral health and multi specialty telehealth | Custom quote | Expert managed front office, coding, and eligibility verification for virtual care compliance |
| 9 | Infinx | Practices needing AI coding and prior auth automation | Custom enterprise pricing | AI driven prior authorization and RCM analytics built specifically for high volume virtual visits |
| 10 | MedCare MSO | Urgent care and remote telehealth providers | Percent of collections | Charge capture and insurance eligibility verification tailored to virtual consult workflows |
EZ MD Solutions earns the top spot by solving what most telehealth billing companies cannot. Beyond claim submission and denial management, the company combines medical billing and revenue cycle management with virtual medical assistants, medical scribes, and credentialing and provider enrollment under one HIPAA compliant platform. For telehealth practices that also need documentation support, front-office coverage, and payer enrollment handled without juggling multiple vendors, this bundled model is a direct operational advantage. Bilingual support teams further extend access for practices serving diverse patient populations.
Athenahealth processes over 400 million claim checks annually with more than 23,000 proprietary validation rules. Its cloud-based platform integrates EHR, practice management, and telehealth billing in one environment, making it a strong fit for large multi-location practices and federally qualified health centers.
CareCloud’s AI-powered billing engine catches errors before submission across more than 70 specialties. Real-time analytics dashboards give practice leadership visibility into virtual care claim performance, denial trends, and revenue gaps.
eClinicalWorks offers a native telehealth module that unifies virtual visits with billing and charge capture in one platform. Existing eClinicalWorks users can add RCM services without migrating data, making it the lowest-friction upgrade path available.
NextGen Healthcare connects virtual visits to end-to-end RCM workflows through an integrated patient payment portal. Its automation tools reduce days in accounts receivable and keep virtual care claims moving through payer queues.
DrChrono is built for mobile-first and independent telehealth providers, with an iPad-native EHR that routes claims with correct Place of Service codes automatically. Clinical documentation flows directly into billing, eliminating a common source of POS and modifier errors.
Tebra connects solo and small practices with a network of more than 1,600 specialty-matched billers who already understand each practice’s CPT patterns and payer requirements. Automated claims scrubbing keeps telehealth billing manageable for practices without a dedicated in-house billing team.
SybridMD specializes in behavioral health and multi-specialty telehealth, managing front office, coding, and eligibility verification for virtual care compliance. Mental health accounts for 68.9% of all U.S. telehealth claim lines according to FAIR Health, making behavioral health billing depth essential for many practices.
Infinx focuses on AI-driven coding and prior authorization automation, directly addressing the growing Medicare Advantage prior auth requirement for virtual visits. Its RCM analytics tools help high-volume practices identify denial patterns at the source rather than chasing individual claims.
MedCare MSO focuses on urgent care and remote telehealth, with charge capture and insurance eligibility verification tailored to virtual consult workflows. Practices running episodic telehealth alongside in-person urgent care benefit from its specialist experience in both modalities.
Not every billing company handles virtual care claims with the same depth. Before selecting a partner, confirm the following to avoid costly surprises.
Confirm the partner distinguishes correctly between POS 02 and POS 10 and validates patient location documentation before claim submission.
Ask how the team handles Modifier 95 for audio-video and Modifier 93 for audio-only visits, and whether these are validated separately given that payer denial patterns differ across modalities.
The CMS approved telehealth services list is updated annually. Confirm the company tracks additions and deletions proactively rather than after a denial occurs.
Since January 2026, Medicare requires an in-person visit before the first mental health telehealth session. Ask how the vendor tracks this requirement across your patient panel.
Virtual visits from Medicare Advantage and certain commercial payers require prior auth. Confirm the partner has an active prior auth process rather than flagging denials after the fact.
A billing partner that works inside your existing EHR eliminates data transfer errors and keeps your AR visibility intact
Practices that pair telemedicine billing services with credentialing and virtual staffing under one vendor reduce coordination overhead and prevent enrollment gaps from triggering billing interruptions.
Telehealth billing in 2026 operates under a layered set of rules that differ from standard in-person claim requirements. POS 10 pays at the higher non-facility rate because the patient is at home, while POS 02 pays the lower facility rate. Medicare retired the GT modifier for standard Part B claims in 2018, and practices still appending it to non-Critical Access Hospital claims are generating avoidable denials. CPT codes 99441 through 99443 were deleted on January 1, 2025, and any claim submitted with them in 2026 is denied automatically. The CMS telehealth services list is the authoritative source for which codes are eligible, and it is updated each calendar year. A billing partner that tracks these updates continuously rather than relying on annual staff training is a direct line of defense against the modifier and POS errors that drive the 30% of telehealth denials tied to documentation and coding issues.
As telehealth becomes a permanent part of how practices operate, the billing infrastructure behind it needs to match. The right telehealth billing company does more than submit claims. It validates POS codes, tracks modifier rules, manages prior authorizations, and keeps providers enrolled and ready to bill across every payer.
EZ MD Solutions ranks at the top because it combines telehealth billing with virtual medical assistants, scribing, and credentialing under one HIPAA compliant platform. Athenahealth, CareCloud, and eClinicalWorks are also strong choices depending on practice size and technology preferences.
POS 02 applies when the patient connects from a clinic or non-home facility and pays at the facility rate. POS 10 applies when the patient is at home and pays at the higher non-facility rate. Using the wrong code triggers denials and audit flags, which is why telehealth specific billing partners validate patient location documentation before every submission.
Most telemedicine billing services charge between 4% and 8% of collections, depending on practice size, specialty, and the scope of services bundled into the contract. Some vendors offer flat-fee per-claim pricing. Always confirm whether prior authorization management and denial appeals are included in the base rate.
Yes, and most practices prefer it. A single partner managing both modalities maintains consistent eligibility verification, medical coding, and AR follow-up across all claim types. The risk of using separate vendors is that telehealth-specific modifier and POS errors often go undetected until denial rates climb.
Yes. Telehealth claims require accurate POS code selection, modifier application for audio-video versus audio-only visits, verification that each CPT code is on the current CMS telehealth services list, and payer-specific rule tracking across Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and commercial plans. Generic billing teams often lag behind CMS updates by 60 to 90 days, which directly translates into preventable denials.
EZ MD Solutions, LLC supports 75+ active US healthcare practices with a team of 200+ across the US, Latin America, and Asia.
sales@ezmdsolutions.com
Copyright © 2026. EZ MD Solutions. All Rights Reserved.| Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Complete the form, and our expert team will reach out to understand your unique needs and provide tailored solutions to drive your practice’s success.
Let’s discuss together.